Tuesday, 7 May 2019

Kenya SGR (madaraka express) vs Tanzania SGR

Tanzania’s Standard Gauge rail
Introduction
The Government of the United Republic of Tanzania (GoT) through the Reli Assets Holding Company (RAHCO), currently rebranded as Tanzania Railway Corporation (TRC), is embarking on a major railway revitalization programme in the country through the rehabilitation and construction of new railway line links. The GoT intends to construct a Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) from Dar es Salaam to Mwanza via Isaka (1,219 km). This partly follows the African Union (AU) and East African Community (EAC) decision in 2006, which was that all new railway development projects on the continent would be to a standard gauge specification. TRC intends to lay a separate SGR line alongside the existing Metre Gauge Railway (MGR) along the entire length from Dar es Salaam to Mwanza, via Isaka.
 
The implementation of the project is being undertaken in phases. Phase I (Dar es Salaam to Morogoro) and Phase II (Morogoro to Makutopora) have a total length of approximately 541 km. The GoT, through TRC, awarded Yapi Merkezi Insaat VE Sanayi (Yapi Merkezi) to provide design services and actual construction of the SGR. The Project is being implemented under a design and build scenario.
 
Scope of work


The proposed SGR will require the construction of bridges overpasses, underpasses and culverts. Overpasses and underpasses will be provided where the proposed SGR intersects with existing roads. A flood risk assessment covering the SGR alignment has been conducted to identify and classify river crossings according to size of the catchments. Based on the results of the flood risk assessment, Culverts are provided beneath embankments where natural watercourses occur or where required for drainage beneath the proposed SGR. Bridges will be required where the proposed SGR will cross over significant more large rivers.

Viaducts will also be required where the proposed SGR passes through well established
towns and or cities. Viaducts will allow the proposed SGR to be elevated through towns / cities. Four viaducts are proposed in Dar es Salaam and will vary in length from 102.7 m to 2,156.7 m.

In addition to the above, cattle and pedestrian crossing underpasses will also be constructed. The locations of these facilities have been defined according to the design requirements and stakeholder meetings.
 
Moreover, the proposed SGR will require support facilities including stations and marshalling yards. The stations along the proposed SGR are to serve as passenger and freight facilities. The marshalling yard will include a maintenance and assembly workshop, tank washing point, shed for shunting locomotive, wheelsets deposit shed and air compressor workshop, living quarters, general office building, canteen, bathroom and other facilities.

Comparison
Item
KENYAN SGR (MSA-NBO)
TANZANIA SGR (DAR-MORO)
Project cost
·         KES 327 billion ($3.804b)(including civil works, facilities, locomotives and rolling stock)
·  $2.9b  
(USD1.029 Billion excluding the cost of locomotives)      

Start date
·         1st October 2014
-April 2017
Estimated period for construction
·         42 months
(commissioned 1st, June, 2017)
·         To be commissioned NOV 2019
Rail length (Msa-Nbi)
-  472 km route length
-609.3 km track length
-205 km route length
-300km track length
Stations
·         Single Track with 33 crossing stations each loop line measuring 1.2km long
·         2 big stations at msa, nbi and 5 smaller ones at Mariakani, Voi, Mtito Andei, Sultan Hamud and Athi River.

Gauge
·         1,435 mm
·         1,435 mm
Design standard for civil works
·         Chinese standards
-AREMA
Minimum horizontal curve radius
·         1,200 meters; difficult sections 800 meters
·         1,900 meters minimum
Minimum vertical curve radius
·         10,000 meters

Maximum gradient
·         1.2%
·         1.2%
Passing loops
·         -
·         3-km long at = 30km intervals approximately or at stations (Subject to capacity assessment and performance  modelling)
Alignment
·         -
·     
Loading gauge
·         Double stack containers and future electrification
-Single Stack
Axel load
·         25 tonnes (minimum)
·         35 Tonnes Maximum
Rail beams type
·         Rail-International union of railways (UIC) 60 (60 kg/m)
-Not CWR
·         UIC 60 CWR rails on concrete sleepers at 60 cm spacing

·          

Number of tracks
·         Single initially (civil infrastructure prepared for future doubling)
·         Single track
Switches
·         Electrically operated

Power type
·         Diesel initially
·         Passenger:  3,300 HP
·         Freight: 5,000 HP
·         Shunting:  2,000 HP
·         Electric
·         EMU and Locomotive hauled passenger trains
No. of locomotives
·         56 diesel locomotives. The locomotives shall power 1,620 Freight Wagons and 40 Passenger Coaches.
-3 EMU
- 10 cargo electric locomotives
-60 passenger coaches
-100 freight wagons and maintenance equipment
Maintenance locomotives
·         -
-
Freight train
·         54 double stack flat wagons carrying 216  twenty feet equivalent units (TEUs)-4,000 tonnes
·         Average speed of 80 KPH
·       
·         Design speed of 120 KPH
Passenger train
·         capacity of 960 passengers/train
·         Average speed of 120 KPH
·         Design speed of 160 KPH
Signalling and communication
·         -
-ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System) level 2.
Other fancy stuff
·         Maximum safety and comfort for passengers at the stations and inside the trains.
·         Freight train  operated on the basis of speed, safety and cost effectiveness
·         environmental compatibility particularly within the national parks where fencing will be provided along with under passages for wild animals
·         Animal proof fence to be provided in the open country with accommodation crossings or elevated sections to suit environment and wildlife.
Funding
·         The loan from EXIM Bank is USD 3.233 billion (85 %) while the government of Kenya is to contribute the remaining 15 %.
-Funding partly by Tanzania government. 50% borrowed/ 50% domestic.

Sources




Monday, 23 July 2018

KENYA TV STATIONS

KENYA TV

Saturday, 29 April 2017

Stream audio FM radio Kenya Africa

INTERNATIONAL RADIO STATIONS







LOCAL (KENYAN) RADIO STATIONS

Sunday, 9 October 2016

Kenya’s SGR (Mombasa-Nairobi) VS Ethiopia rail (Addis-Djibouti) - PART II

Ethiopia has recently launched its Chinese built SGR that will link Ethiopia's capital Addis with port at Djibouti.

Inauguration of Ethiopia's SGR - Skyscrapercity

In the previous article we compared Kenya's diesel powered SGR with Ethiopia's electric powered SGR. It has been a general attitude regionally and far beyond that the Kenyan railway cost has been inflated through corruption leading to an escalation of total cost to around USD 3.8B (600km) compared with USD 3.4 B for Ethiopian line.

Many have written either to justify [1] or to disown [2, 3, 4, 5, 6] the enormous cost of Kenya's diesel powered railway infrastructure. Many of those against the exorbitant cost of Kenyan rail are influenced by the fact that the Kenyan rail is diesel powered, shorter, traverses a flatter terain among other reasons. The proponents legitimizing the cost cite the "superior" nature of the Kenya's SGR e.g. for example when it comes to double stacking of cargo, class one trains, provision for electrification in future, higher cargo capacity, longer turning radii, longer elevated length, more "western" looking train stations, more passenger couches...etc.

An elevated section of Kenya's SGR - Skyscrapercity

Economy
Much as been written on the capital cost of the railways but there is scarcity of information regarding the viability study reports for both projects.

The fundamentals point to a cheaper cost for the Ethiopian line in terms of passenger and cargo traffic. Lets have a comparison: Electricity, Labour, Capital cost, O&M


A comparison of fundamentals
Fundamental
KENYAN SGR
ETHIOPIAN RAIL
Comment
Electricity


Labour


Capital cost


Operation & Maintenance


Other














Reference
1. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/06/next-stop-the-red-sea-ethiopia-opens-chinese-built-railway-to-djibouti#img-4
2. http://nextgeninfraworld.blogspot.co.ke/2015/01/kenyas-sgr-mombasa-nairobi-vs-ethiopia.html
3. http://nairobiwire.com/2016/10/analysis-ethiopia-unveils-750-kilometre-electric-sgr-but-is-it-better-than-kenyas.html
4. http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/business/article/2000204183/sh16-billion-enough-to-build-new-rail-project-says-leading-uk-magazine
5. http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/business/article/2000101450/why-rail-project-could-be-kenya-s-biggest-scandal-yet
6. http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000218960/eurobond-sgr-heists-to-finance-2017-election-campaigns-claims-githongo


Thursday, 29 September 2016

The state of Kenya's public transport

Kenya has embraced the most primitive means of public transport in the history of the world. The privatization of subsidized so-called Nyayo bus in 1995 saw the provision of urban transport move into private hands. Much of it ended up mostly in rich (political elites) who have controlled various transport routes directly or by means of proxy cartels, for example the Mungiki. Since then, the quality of services offered has dwindled due to the unprofessional and careless nature in which the private entities plan and manage the transport services. Profit making has therefore come first before quality service delivery.

The model bus (matatu) used is typically, in majority of cases, a "mobile discotheque" bearing all sort of art mimicking the African American ghetto lifestyle from images, music, videos, tattoos, bling, shiny rims and other fancy ideas. These buses violate most laid out traffic rules hence not only endangering human lives but also destroy vital city infrastructure and the environment in the process.
A typical bus
Although the National Environmental Authority has limited the sound decibel level in public spaces to human health acceptable levels (30-40 decibels), which were briefly implemented by the late minister Michuki, the laws are hardly adhered to.

The matatu culture also comes with a rampant culture of drug abuse among the driver and co-driver. These drugs range from miraa/khat, marijuana, and also more hardcore drugs. The stressful nature of the job and peer pressure might be some of the reasons why the individuals take the drugs.

Involvement in Road Accidents
It is very near impossible for a day to pass without an accident involving the matatu crooks given the careless nature in which they are operated. An example is the most recent accident involving a matatu along Langata road in Nairobi that killed four people while injuring six. It is said that the driver of the matatu "lost control" and rolled while he was over-speeding.

Matatu accident
 Apart from the owners and operators, the passengers themselves take a blame for promoting the dangerous matatu culture. More importantly, the ultimate responsibility rests on the government. However, president Uhuru Kenyatta's actions have raised doubts of any possible improvement in the near future through his endorsement of the culprits who own and operate the matatus. 


    

Friday, 26 August 2016

Waste-to-Energy plants in Africa

According to Wikipedia, a waste-to-energy plant is a waste management facility that combusts wastes to produce electricity. It is also called a trash-to-energy, municipal waste incineration, energy recovery, or resource recovery plant. Unlike old incinerators, modern energy recovery facilities incorporate mechanisms that remove hazardous or recyclable materials before combustion.

By combustion, the volume and weight of waste material is reduced by 90 percent and 75 percent respectively.



Typical W2E plant schematic


The application of waste to energy plants in Africa is still very scarce due to the complex technology and immense initial capital requirements. This post will detail some of the facilities that are already installed and those currently under construction in Africa.

Perhaps the biggest setback is the lack of incentives for green waste management solutions. The power and heat generated by W2E plants do not economically justify the installation of a W2E plant. Thus incentives, such as carbon credits and other forms of compensation are a requirement to initiate such projects.

Comparative cost of generating power


Installed W2E plants in Africa

1. Ethiopia 50 MW Koshe W2E plant
Ethiopian Electric Power Corporation (EEPCo)  and Cambridge Industries, a United Kingdom based firm, signed an agreement January 4, 2013 for the construction of a 50 MW plant in Addis. Feasibilty studies were also conducted in other cities throughout Ethiopia to recommend future projects in various cities including Dire Dawa, Adama, Mekelle, Gonder, Behar Dar, Hawasa, and Jimma. This will be the country’s first waste-to-energy Project and will process 350,000 tons of waste annually.


The plant was 75% complete as of the end of 2015 and expected to be operational in 2016.

More details will come soon...

2. 












Sources